Michael Jackson: Is it true that the boy who accused Michael J of molesting him has admitted he lied? - michael j. everton
I've heard that it can not confirm this. The child's family was paid twenty million U.S. dollars for Michael. Let me know if you heard something.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Michael J. Everton Michael Jackson: Is It True That The Boy Who Accused Michael J Of Molesting Him Has Admitted He Lied?
8 comments:
They relate to children between 2 different ..
The First Family paid 22 million MJ in 1993 to avoid legal action (I do not understand .... if I MJ, I sat across the street I am innocent and I can prove it)
People say, lie was admitted in 2003 ... but I've never read or seen no evidence of a legitimate news source (such as CNN or other television news). I have only the "evidence" on the sides of MJ fan and nowhere else.
No, it was just a rumor. He never said he lied. No official explanation.
The family was paid for by Michael Jackson, so that the process could still quickly closed.
It was a bad person at all, but it had serious problems and need help.
The jury in the trial of Michael Jackson for child molestation, he simply said "sufficient" evidence for a conviction.
The law always appropriate and the use of the words "not guilty" not necessarily "innocent" had been said as the last word, never by the jury. People who say that Michael Jackson is innocent, "ignorant" media law.
Please read the reports of the police in the test before they are used when someone is innocent or not for personal or after reading a book.
The police found in his private room contains a lot of gay porn magazines with young children (aged) in them.
Please read the thousand pages of the official process to know what happens to young children at home.
The jury said it was notSufficient evidence to convict, the jury said there was no evidence.
It was really a great artist, no one can deny, but his private life was very different from what you see on television or read books.
No, it was just a rumor. He never said he lied. No official explanation.
The family was paid for by Michael Jackson, so that the process could still quickly closed.
It was a bad person at all, but it had serious problems and need help.
The jury in the trial of Michael Jackson for child molestation, he simply said "sufficient" evidence for a conviction.
The law always appropriate and the use of the words "not guilty" not necessarily "innocent" had been said as the last word, never by the jury. People who say that Michael Jackson is innocent, "ignorant" media law.
Please read the reports of the police in the test before they are used when someone is innocent or not for personal or after reading a book.
The police found in his private room contains a lot of gay porn magazines with young children (aged) in them.
Please read the thousand pages of the official process to know what happens to young children at home.
The jury said it was notSufficient evidence to convict, the jury said there was no evidence.
It was really a great artist, no one can deny, but his private life was very different from what you see on television or read books.
No, it was just a rumor. He never said he lied. No official explanation.
The family was paid for by Michael Jackson, so that the process could still quickly closed.
It was a bad person at all, but it had serious problems and need help.
The jury in the trial of Michael Jackson for child molestation, he simply said "sufficient" evidence for a conviction.
The law always appropriate and the use of the words "not guilty" not necessarily "innocent" had been said as the last word, never by the jury. People who say that Michael Jackson is innocent, "ignorant" media law.
Please read the reports of the police in the test before they are used when someone is innocent or not for personal or after reading a book.
The police found in his private room contains a lot of gay porn magazines with young children (aged) in them.
Please read the thousand pages of the official process to know what happens to young children at home.
The jury said it was notSufficient evidence to convict, the jury said there was no evidence.
It was really a great artist, no one can deny, but his private life was very different from what you see on television or read books.
If that were true, it would be in all news channels.
I looked everywhere and I can find no evidence of a reliable news station
Yes, really
yes
Post a Comment