Do you think a 19 year old is little young to be having children because it can affect the psychosocial? - little young loli
Development? (Unfortunately, there was more space on the top)
19 years old brain is still in development in adults and in some ways their bodies are still developing physically. What do you think?
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Little Young Loli Do You Think A 19 Year Old Is Little Young To Be Having Children Because It Can Affect The Psychosocial?
11 comments:
I think many people have much to learn about life at this point too. Difficult it becomes for the children in this context, however, the added responsibility of learning in itself is the power to others. In India, there are still cultures where it is normal that people have children in the 13-15 rule. In these cultures, but the unity of the family that works differently than ours, so that the children often help grandparents, their learning process. I think it is a question of universal access to education of a child as a whole, that the quality of mental development and learning determined. Thus the age of 29 have more experience and knowledge, but to keep the child from the rest of the world's knowledge, for example, the child will experience more difficulties of the child 19, the height has to have in normal social conditions.
I do not think the body physically ready to have a baby, until a woman is 23 years. While many women have healthy babies so young, could be one of the reasons why some women have problems with women. I think some teenagers are too young to have children and have established some 30 years ago are still too young. Some never interfere in his life, some people are over 70 years and are not mature enough to be in the vicinity of children.
I do not think the body physically ready to have a baby, until a woman is 23 years. While many women have healthy babies so young, could be one of the reasons why some women have problems with women. I think some teenagers are too young to have children and have established some 30 years ago are still too young. Some never interfere in his life, some people are over 70 years and are not mature enough to be in the vicinity of children.
on the basis of evolutionary biology ...... The people have had children at a younger age than the present from the beginning
What is new is the waiting time for children to do today
For most of human history, was the life expectancy is so short, you wouldnt expect to thirty, because you do not live as long
where people live to 40 years, they begin with children aged 13 to 15
where people live to 80, tend to begin, children aged 26 to 30
Religion is to blame, but you can blame biology?
Well, it is certainly not for the development of benefit to a child so young.
It is deeply to be increased enough in the pocket book, and likely to harm the child in an environment that is unprepared for a child, mentally and financially.
I can not judge whether this is the right to a mistake, a child. I understand your argument and you're probably thinking right, but in certain parts of the world much younger children, children. I was much older than my two, I had time to think. I think .........
If you do this, because it affects the psycho-reaching, finally, that more responsibility and a serious responsibility is a big, difficult to bring to bear on his shoulders.
You're right. Only a miracle baby usually happens at this age.
no,
I think everyone under 16 is too young
I was 21 when I, my son, now almost 6
Xx 19 is good
I must say, quite simply the nature and disagreed on this issue.
Sash.
Not really.
My sister recently had her baby at 19 and she is fine.
Even the person who Bitchy
Post a Comment